Prediction of Chuck Adams vs Jamie Morgan Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Adams vs J. Morgan

Chuck Adams

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

317

Best Rank

338

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Jamie Morgan

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

317

Best Rank

338

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Adams 1 - 0 Morgan

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chuck Adams winning 2 and Jamie Morgan winning 0. The last match between Chuck Adams and Jamie Morgan was at the Memphis, 07-02-1994, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Chuck Adams getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Adams	1
Morgan	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Memphis(02-07-94)

Stats

Chuck Adams

Jamie Morgan

C. Adams vs J. Morgan H2H Profile

C. Adams	Stats	J. Morgan
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
49.00% (98-102)	Career Total W/L	43.59% (68-88)
1	Indoor	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Adams vs J. Morgan Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chuck Adams has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jamie Morgan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chuck Adams, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jamie Morgan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chuck Adams has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jamie Morgan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chuck Adams has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jamie Morgan winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chuck Adams has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 73/66), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 4/12). Jamie Morgan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 10/11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/11).
Player level: In the last year, Chuck Adams has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jamie Morgan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chuck Adams winning 1 times and Jamie Morgan being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chuck Adams winning 2 and Jamie Morgan winning 0.
The last match between Chuck Adams and Jamie Morgan was at the Memphis, 07-02-1994, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Chuck Adams getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chuck Adams has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jamie Morgan has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chuck Adams has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jamie Morgan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chuck Adams has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jamie Morgan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chuck Adams vs Jamie Morgan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Adams vs J. Morgan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Adams	Stats	J. Morgan
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Adams Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - 26-08-1996
R1 Dirk DierD. Dier	L	6-4 2-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
New Haven - 12-08-1996
R1 Steve CampbellS. Campbell	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Alex O'BrienA. O'Brien	L	6-3 2-6 6-2	Stats
R2 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Washington - 15-07-1996
R1 Byron BlackB. Black	L	5-7 6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Morgan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 15-01-1996
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-2 6-4 7-5	Stats
Tokyo - 09-10-1995
R1 Henrik HolmH. Holm	L	3-6 7-6(2) 6-3	Stats
Kuala Lumpur - 02-10-1995
R1 Mark PhilippoussisM. Philippoussis	L	1-6 7-6(2) 6-4	Stats
Canadian Open - 24-07-1995
R1 Martin Damm (1972)M. Damm	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
R2 Thomas EnqvistT. Enqvist	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Adams vs J. Morgan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Adams	Stats	J. Morgan
49.00% (98/102)	YTD Win/Loss	43.59% (68/88)
49.40% (248/254)	Sets Win/Loss	44.25% (177/223)
49.52% (2456/2504)	Games Win/Loss	48.73% (1934/2035)
52.52% (73/66)	Hard Win/Loss	46.25% (37/43)
25.00% (4/12)	Clay Win/Loss	36.84% (7/12)
51.43% (18/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	38.89% (14/22)
30.00% (3/7)	Grass Win/Loss	47.62% (10/11)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
219.08	Average Opponent Rank	236.9
36.36% (8/14)	Slam W/L	31.82% (7/15)
37.50% (6/10)	Masters W/L	44.44% (4/5)
50.00% (69/69)	Main Tour W/L	44.55% (49/61)
62.50% (15/9)	Challenger W/L	53.33% (8/7)
50% (90/179)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	45% (60/134)
38% (8/21)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (7/21)
53% (39/74)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	45% (28/62)
48% (32/67)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (27/56)
80% (101/81)	1st Set Won, Won Match	74% (73/54)
20% (101/20)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	26% (73/19)
17% (99/17)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (83/13)